🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed new appeals had come from intermediaries to restart talks with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult course since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that American atomic experts could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed three times they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The American leader recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith difficult to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and continues the primary answer to settle conflicts, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the administration and the state in the wake of this invasion."