🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and financial needs.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."