🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how little it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.